Victoria Secret is a huge retailer of both lingerie and beauty products so I doubt that they will be taking Macrida Patterson too seriously: and they will be able to pay for their legal costs out of the profits of just one of their lingerie lines I should think.
I don’t know what to rant about on this one: the lawsuit is the obvious starting place - like hello: a thong dangerous: you need to get out more love! But the thing that caught my eye was that this woman is over 50 - and wearing a “low-rise v-string” - I mean hello. Haven’t you figured out that thongs are quite possibly one of the most uncomfortable bits of lingerie ever designed, almost certainly by a man, for women to wear. Most of us gave them up when we hit 21: put your tights over your pants - thats the trick for reducing visible panty line
Related Posts
Comments
With a name like Macrida, you know she has to be one sexy lady who should be wearing a thong….
Perhaps Victoria Secret should start placing disclaimers on their thongs with warnings like (WARNING: IF YOUR A 52 YEAR OLD FAT ASS BE CAREFUL OF POSSIBLE SLING SHOT AFFECT WHEN YOUR ATTEMPTING TO PLACE GARMENT ON YOUR HUGE COTTAGE CHEESE TURD CUTTER OF AN ASS)..Maybe a countersuit is in the works for indecent exposure and misuse of a garment.
There is no way that woman should be wearing a thong. Yukk…. She is just money hungry and should be made to pay the legal fees of whoever she sues. Nasty.
SERIOUSLY……..YOUR JOKING RIGHT?!!! Come on lady….this is absolutely laughable~!!!! In fact…..i laughed so hard I think the underwire in my victoria’s secret’s bra just damaged my boob. JK!!! Get a life and stop sueing for your big ol but trying to put on a thong. And has anyone stopped to ponder how the decorative piece went from the side of the underwear to her eye……………how does this lady put on her panties?
LOL thanks for the comments guys: yes the mind does actually boggle as to what she was doing when the accident occurred _ but I for 1 don’t want to see the demo on youtube
